It is not enough to have a good idea. Your good idea must also be well positioned, or review panels for grant agencies are unlikely to approve it. Grant writing is the end of a process, not the beginning. Long before you make the decision to write a grant proposal for your research, you should be taking concrete steps to raise your profile in the eyes of reviewers.
What does that mean? Most basically, it means preparing yourself as a scholar, a researcher, and a grant writer in ways that will strengthen the ideas behind your proposal, demonstrate that you have the wherewithal to carry out your project, and enhance your ability to communicate what reviewers are looking for.
The following article from the Chronicle of Higher Education describes ways to become a successful PI:
The Pattullo Conference workshop report is complete! It includes a summary of the conference, an update on MPOWIR activities, and results from an online survey of participants.
Last summer, the New York Times ran an article entitled "No Doubts: Women Are Better Managers," which unleashed a firestorm of comments (over 300), many of which railed against the inherent sexism of that proposition and others that suggested that women were in fact worse bosses, who were harder on their female subordinates than males.
The following article, posted on the Tomorrows-Professor email list, describes what science says about male and female managers, and some evidence-based advice for working with men and women in the lab. The article is by Edyta Zielinska and is from The Scientist: Magazine of the Life Sciences, Volume 24, Issue 6, Page 71, June 1, 2010.
To subscribe to the Tomorrows-Professor Mailing list, go to:
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/tomorrows-professor
The Department of Physics at the University of Massachusetts Dartmouth has an opening for a postdoctoral research associate to study oceanic submesoscale processes, their implications for vertical fluxes on scales of 100 m - 10 km, their interaction with mesoscales and dependence on mixing, using modeling and analysis. Knowledge of ocean dynamics and modeling at small and large scales, mixing parameterizations, data analysis, or theoretical oceanography is a plus. The position is funded by NSF collaborative award and offers scope of interdisciplinary numerical and theoretical work motivated by observations. The fellow will work with the research group of Prof. Amit Tandon and interact with Dr. Amala Mahadevan and her research group at Boston University, and with graduate students and scientists at the School for Marine Science and Technology (SMAST). Other responsibilities may include assistance in grant proposal writing and general lab/student supervision.
The minimum qualifications are a Ph.D. in physical oceanography, atmospheric sciences, applied mathematics, mechanical engineering, environmental physics or a closely-related field and eligibility to be employed in the United States. The candidate should be highly motivated and have demonstrated ability to work independently as well as within a research group. Strong oral and written communication skills are essential. Salary is commensurate with qualifications. The initial appointment at UMass Dartmouth will be for one year, with possibilities for extension to a second year.For more information about this position please see http://www.umassd.ed/hr/postdocphysics4-10.cfm
Applicants should send a letter stating their interests and qualifications, along with a current curriculum vitae, a brief narrative describing their professional goals, and a list of three professional references, electronically to atandon@umassd.edu.
Review of applications will begin immediately and continue until the position is filled. An official graduate transcript will be required for finalists. The University of Massachusetts Dartmouth is an EEO/AA employer.
Doctoral students in the United States are finishing their degrees faster than at any point since at least 1983. But that's not actually saying much. Their average time-to-degree is still a formidable 7.7 years—and that, of course, is for the students who manage to finish at all. By some estimates, more than 30 percent of the students who enter American doctoral programs walk away empty-handed.
A report released in March by the Council of Graduate Schools highlights some of what the council calls "promising practices" that might reduce attrition rates and average time-to-degree. The report draws on data from more than 20 universities that have taken part in the council's Ph.D. Completion Project, a seven-year study of doctoral-program attrition—especially the attrition of women and underrepresented minorities.
The practices described in the report include:
Click here for the full article:
http://chronicle.com/article/Help-to-the-Finish-Line-Wa/64879/

Recent Comments